No. 64 (2022): Políticas de justicia y reparación
Anthropological Research

Vegetal ethnography. On the world we built in collaboration with plants

PDF (Español (España)) XML (Español (España))
  • Leticia Durand
Leticia Durand
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Centro Regional de Investigaciones Multidisciplinarias
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24275/uam/izt/dcsh/alteridades/2022v32n64/Durand

Published 2022-11-03

Keywords

  • multispecies ethnography,
  • vegetal agency,
  • Anthropocene,
  • ontological turn,
  • non human

How to Cite

Durand, L. (2022). Vegetal ethnography. On the world we built in collaboration with plants. Alteridades, 32(64). https://doi.org/10.24275/uam/izt/dcsh/alteridades/2022v32n64/Durand
Copyright Notice

Abstract

The main goal of this paper is to describe vegetal ethnography, an area of study interested in observing plants as beings with agency. Based on a literature review, the theoretical proposal, the main concepts, and some relevant works and authors are presented. Among the results, it is found that the reworking of the notion of agency offers anthropology new opportunities to explore how plants are embedded in social life entanglements. Although vegetal ethnography’s methods are still being developed and there is debate about the limits and possibilities of the tools employed, these new perspectives make it feasible to access other ways of understanding the world, different from those that modernity has established. It is concluded that recognizing the capabilities of plants is a way of questioning human exceptionalism and imagining futures based on collaboration and interdependence.
PDF (Español (España)) XML (Español (España))

References

  1. Acero Aguilar, Myriam (2019). “Esa relación tan especial con los perros y con los gatos: la familia multiespecie y sus metáforas”, en Tabula Rasa, núm. 32, pp. 157-179. https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.n32.08
  2. Ananthaswamy, Anil (2014), “Roots of consciousness”, en New Scientist, vol. 224, núm. 2998, pp. 34–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-4079(14)62338-1
  3. Archambault, Julie Soleil (2016), “Taking love seriously in human-plant relations in Mozambique: toward an anthropology of affective encounters”, en Cultural Anthropology, vol.31, núm. 2, pp. 244- 271. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca31.2.05
  4. Atchinson, Jennifer y Head, Lesley (2017) “Rethinking ethnobotany? A methodological reflection on human-plant research”, en Bastian, M. y Jones, D. et al. (eds) Participatory research in more than human worlds, Routledge, Abingdon, UK. 178-190 pp. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315661698
  5. Barrientos Salinas, Alejandro J. (2020) “Hebras y nudos del mirco: la vida social del tejido del algodón en el piedemonte andino-amazónico”, en Ciencia y Cultura núm. 45, pp. 65-101.
  6. Biedrzycki, Meredith L. y Bais Harsh P. (2010) “Kin recognition in plants: a mysterious behaviour unsolved”, en Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 61, núm 15), pp. 4123–4128. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq250
  7. Blaser, Mario (2009) “Political Ontology. Cultural Studies without ‘cultures’?”, en Cultural Studies, vol. 23, núm. 5-6, pp. 873-896 https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380903208023
  8. Blaser, Mario (2016) “Is another cosmopolitics possible?”, en Cultural Anthropology, vol. 31, núm. 4, pp. 545-570. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca31.4.05
  9. Braidotti, Rosi (2013) “Posthuman Humanities”, en European Educational Research Journal, vol. 12, núm. 1, pp. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.2304%2Feerj.2013.12.1.1
  10. Brice, Jeremy (2014), “Attending to grape vines: perceptual practices, planty agencies and multiple temporalities in Australina viticulture”, en Social and Cultural Geography, vol. 15, núm. 8, pp. 942-965. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2014.883637
  11. Chao, Sophie (2018a), “In the shadow of the palm. Ontologies among Marind, West Papua”, en Cultural Anthropology, vol. 33, núm. 4, pp. 621-649.https://doi.org/10.14506/ca33.4.08
  12. Chao, Sophie (2018b), “Seed care in the palm oil sector”, en Environmental Humanities, vol. 10, núm. 2, pp. 422-446.https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-7156816
  13. Chakrabarty, Dipesh (2009), “The climate of history: four theses”, en Critical Inquiry, vol. 35, núm. 2, pp. 197-222. https://doi.org/10.1086/596640
  14. Danowski, Deborah y Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo (2019) ¿Hay un mundo por venir? Ensayo sobre los miedos y los fines. Caja Negra Editora, Buenos Aires. 224 pp.
  15. De la Cadena, Marisol (2015), Earth Beings. Ecologies of practice across Andean worlds, Duke University Press, EUA, 340 pp.
  16. Descola, Philippe (1988) La selva culta. Simbolismo y praxis en la ecología de los Achuar. Institut français d’études andines, Lima. <http://books.openedition.org/ifea/1600> https://doi.org/10.4000/books.ifea.1600.
  17. Di Deus, Eduardo (2019) “The tree that responds: taming the rubber three”, en Vibrant. Virtual Brazilian Anthropology, vol. 16, e16551.
  18. Doody, Brendan J.; Perkins, Harvey C.; Sullivan, Jon J.; Meurk, Colin D., y Stewart, Glenn H. (2014), “Performing Weeds: Gardening, Plant Agencies and Urban Plant Conservation”, en Geoforum, vol. 56, pp. 124-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.07.001
  19. Dowling, Robyn; Lloyd, Kate y Suchet Pearson, Sandra (2017), “Qualitative methods II: ‘More-than-human’ methodologies and/in praxis”, en Progress in Human Geography, vol. 4, núm. 6, pp. 823-831. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516664439
  20. Durand, Leticia (2002), “La relación ambiente-cultura en antropología. Recuento y perspectivas”, en Nueva Antropología, vol. XVIII, núm. 61, pp. 169-184.
  21. Edwards, Wil y Moles, Angela T. (2009), “Re-contemplate an entangled bank: The Power of Movement in Plants revisited”, en Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, vol. 160, núm. 2, pp. 111–118.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00972.x
  22. Elton, Sarah (2020), A posthumanist study of health and food system: vegetal politics in Toronto urban gardens in the Anthropocene. Ph D. Thesis in Social and Behavioral Health Sciences, University of Toronto, 196 pp.
  23. Escobar, Arturo (2010), “Postconstructivist political ecologies”, en Redclift, Michael y Woodgate, Graham (eds.) International Handbook of Environmental Sociology. Elward Elgar Publishing, UK, 91-105 pp.
  24. Fleming, Jake (2017) “Toward vegetal political ecology: Kyrgystan’s walnut-fruit forest and the politics of graftability”, en Geoforum, vol. 79, pp. 26-35.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.12.009
  25. Flores, María Eugenia, Echazú Boschemier, Ana Grete y Greco, Lucrecia Raquel. (2019), “Plantas compañeras. Coca, ayahuasca y el cuerpo de las curanderas en Argentina y Perú”, en Valcarcel, Mayra Soledad y García Somoza, Mari-Sol (comps.) Género y religiosidad. Sentidos y experiencias femeninas de lo sagrado, Bosque Editores y Kula Antropología, Argentina, 93-114 pp.
  27. Gagliano, Mónica (2015), “In a green frame of mind: perspectives on the behavioural ecology and cognitive nature of plants”, en AoB PLANTS, vol 7, plu075. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plu075
  28. Gibson, Diana (2018), “Towards plant-centred methodologies in anthropology”, en Anthropology Southern Africa, vol. 41, núm. 2, pp. 92-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/23323256.2018.1468721
  29. Gibson, Hanna y Venkateswar, Sita (2015), “Antrhopological engagement with the Anthropocene”, en Environment and Society: Advances in Research, vol. 6, pp. 5-27. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26204948
  30. Haraway, Donna (2008), When Species Meet. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 440 pp.
  31. Haraway, Donna (2016) Staying with the trouble. Making kin in the Chthulucene, Duke University Press, Durham, 312 pp.
  32. Hartigan, John (2015), “Plant Publics: Multispecies relating in Spanish botanical gardens”, en Anthropological Quaterly, vol. 88, núm. 2, pp. 481-508. https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2015.0024
  33. Hartigan Jr, John (2019) “Plants as ethnographic subjects”, en Anthropology Today, núm, 35, vol. 2, pp. 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.12491
  34. Head, Lesley, Atchinson, Jennifer y Phillips, Catherine (2012), “The distinctive capacities of plants: rethinking difference via invasive species”, en Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, vol. 40, núm. 3, pp. 399-413. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12077
  36. Head, Lesley; Jennifer Atchison, Catherine Phillips, y Kathleen Buckingham (2014), “Vegetal Politics: Belonging, Practices and Places”, en Social & Cultural Geography, vol. 15, núm. 8, pp. 861–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2014.973900.
  37. Hitchings, Russel (2013) “People, plants and performance: on actor network theory and the material pleasures of private gardens”, en Social and Cultural Geography, vol. 4, núm. 1, pp. 99-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464936032000049333
  38. Hopes, Addie y Perry, Laura (2019), Reflections on the Plantacionocene. A conversation with Donna Haraway and Anna Tsing, Edge Effects Magazine and University of Wisconsin, Madison.
  40. Ingold, Tim (2013), “Anthropology beyond the humanity”, en Suomen Antropology: Journal of the Finnish Anthropological Society, vol. 38, núm.3, pp. 5-23.
  41. Jones, Owain y Cloke, Paul (2008), “Non-human agencies: trees in place and time”, en Knappet, C. y Malafouris, L. (eds.) Material Agency. Springer US, EUA, pp 79-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74711-8
  42. Kirksey, Eben; Shuetze, Criag y Helmrich, Stefan (2014), “Introduction. Tactics of multispecies ethnography”, en Kirksey, Eben (ed) The multispecies salon, Duke University Press, Durham, EUA, 1-24 pp.
  43. Kirskey, Eben S. y Helmreich, Stefan (2010) “The emergence of multispecies ethnography”, en Cultural Anthropology, vol. 25, núm. 4, pp. 545-576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01069.x
  44. Kohn, Eduardo (2007), WHow dogs dream: Amazonian natures and the politics of transspeces engagement”, en American Anthropologist , vol. 34, núm. 1, pp. 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.2007.34.1.3
  45. Kohn, Eduardo (2015), “Anthropology of ontologies”, en Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 44, pp. 311-327. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014127
  46. Kull, Christian A. y Rangan, Haripriya (2008), “Acacia exchanges: waffles, thorn trees, and the study of plant movements”, en Geoforum, vol. 39, núm. 3, pp. 1258-1272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.09.009
  47. Latour, Bruno (2012), La esperanza de Pandora. Ensayos sobre la realidad de la ciencia, Editorial Gedisa, España, 382 pp.
  48. Latour, Bruno (2017), Cara a cara con el planeta. Una nueva mirada sobre el cambio climático alejada de las posiciones apocalípticas, Siglo XXI Editores, Buenos Aires, 351 pp.
  49. Levi Strauss, Claude (1985), Las estructuras elementales del parentesco (I). (Obras Maestras del Pensamiento Contemporáneo), Ciudad de México, 286 pp.
  50. Locke, Piers (2018), “Multispecies Ethnography”, en: Callan, Hilary (ed) The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology, John Wiley and Sons, USA.
  51. Mancuso, Stefano y Viola, Alessandra (2019), Sensibilidad e inteligencia en el mundo vegetal, Galaxia Gutemberg, Barcelona, 142 pp.
  52. Marder, Michael (2012), “Plant intentionality and the phenomenological framework of plant intelligence”, en Plant Signaling and Behaviour, vol. 7, núm. 11, pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.21954
  53. Marder, Michale (2013), “Plant intelligence and attention”, en Plant Signaling and Behaviour, vol. 8, núm. 5, e23902. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.23902
  54. Margulis, Lynn y Schwarts, Karlene V. (1985). Cinco reinos. Guía ilustrada de los phyla de la vida en la Tierra. Editorial Labor, Barcelona. 335 pp.
  55. Mintz, Sidney W. (1996), Dulzura y poder. El lugar del azúcar en la historia moderna, Siglo XXI, México, 299 pp.
  56. Moore, Jason (2017), “The Capitalocene, Part I: on the nature and origins of our ecological crisis”, Journal of Peasant Studies, vol 44, núm. 3, pp. 594-630. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1235036
  57. Myers, Natasha (2017), “From Antrhopocene to the Planthroposcene: designing gardens for Plant/People involution”, en History and Anthropology, vol 28, núm. 3; pp 297-301. https://doi.org/10.1080/02757206.2017.1289934
  58. Myers, Natasha (2019), “From Edenic apocalypse to gardens against Eden”, en Hethrington, Kregg (ed), Infraestructure, environment and life in the Anthropocene, Duke University Press, Durham, EUA, pp. 115-148.
  59. Oedgen, Laura A.; Hall, Billy y Tanita, Kimiko (2013), “Animals, Plants, people and things. A review of multispecies ethnography”, en Environment and Society: Advances in Rersearch, vol. 4, núm. 1, pp. 5-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.3167/ares.2013.040102%20
  60. Pitt, Hannah (2014), “On showing and being show plants – a guide to methods for more-than-human geography”, en Area, vol. 47, núm. 8, pp. 48-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12145
  61. Pitt, Hannah (2017), “An apprenticeship in plant thinking”, en Bastian, M., Jones, O., Moore, N., & Roe, E. (eds.), Participatory Research in More-than-Human Worlds, Routledge, London.
  62. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315661698
  63. Poe, Melissa; LeCompte, Joyce, Mclain, Rebecca y Hurley, Patrick (2014), “Urban foranging and the relational ecologies of belonging”, en Social and Cultural Geography, vol. 15, núm. 8, pp. 901-919. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2014.908232
  64. Restrepo, Eduardo (2018), Etnografía: alcances, técnicas y éticas, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, 143 pp.
  65. Richardson Ngwenya, Pamela (2012), “A vitalist approach to sugar-cane breeding in Barbados: in the context of the European Union Sugar Reform”, en Geoforum vol. 43, núm. 6, pp. 1131-1139.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.07.005
  66. Robbins, Paul (2004), “Comparing invasive networks: cultural and political biographies of invasive species”, en Geographical Review, vol. 94, núm. 2, pp. 139-159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2004.tb00164.x
  67. Ruiz Serna, Daniel y Carlos Del Cairo (2016), “Los debates del giro ontológico en torno al naturalismo moderno”, en Revista de Estudio Sociales, núm. 55, pp. 193-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.7440/res55.2016.13
  68. Sánchez, Frida (2020), “Con emotiva carta, mujer se despide de nogal de cien años en NL”, La Razón, 27 de julio de 2020. Consultado 8 de enero de 2021. https://www.razon.com.mx/estados/mi-arbol-mujer-lamenta-caida-nogal-100-anos-nl-399196
  69. Sandilands, Catriona (2013), “Dog stranglers in the Park?: National and vegetal politics in Ontario’s Rouge Valley”, en Journal of Canadian Studies, vol 47, núm. 3, pp. 93-122.
  70. Segata, Jean (2019), “El mosquito-oráculo y otras tecnologías”, en Tabula Rasa, núm. 32, pp. 103-125.https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.n32.06
  71. Sepúlveda Luque, Claudia y Sundberg, Juanita (2017), “Apertura ontológica, multiplicidad y performación: explorando una agenda posthumanista en ecología política a partir del desastre del río Cruces en Valdivia”, en Bustos, Beatriz; Prieto, Manuel y Barton, Jonathan (eds.) Ecología política en Chile. Naturaleza, propiedad, conocimiento y poder, Editorial Universitaria, Santiago de Chile, 167-192 pp.
  72. Sheridan, Michael (2016), “Boundary plants, the social production of space, and vegetative agency in agrarian societies”, en Environment and Society: Advances in Research, núm. 7, pp. 29-49.https://doi.org/10.3167/ares.2016.070103
  73. Simard, Suzanne W. (2019), “Mycorrhizal Networks Facilitate Tree Communication, Learning and Memory”, en Baluska, Frantisek; Gagliano, Monica y Witzany Guenther (eds.) Memory and Learning in Plants, Springer US, EUA, pp. 191-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75596-0
  74. Sundberg, Juanita (2011), “Diabolic Caminos in the Desert and Cat Fights on the Río: A Posthumanist Political Ecology of Boundary Enforcement in the United States–Mexico Borderlands”, en Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 101, núm. 2, pp. 318- 336. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2010.538323
  75. Swanson, Heather Anne (2017), “Methods for multispecies anthropology. Thinking with salmon otoliths and scales”, en Social Analysis, vol. 61, núm. 2, pp. 81-99. https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2017.610206
  76. Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt (2015), The mushroom at the end of the world. On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins, Princeton University Press, Oxford, 352 pp.
  77. Tsing, Anna (2010), “Arts of inclusion, or, how to love a mushroom”, Manoa, vol.2, núm. 22, pp. 191-203.
  78. Tsing, Anna (2012), “Unruly edges: mushrooms as companion species”, en Environmental Humanities, vol 1, núm. 1, pp. 141-154. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3610012
  79. Turner, Víctor (2013), La selva de los símbolos, Siglo XXI, México, 455 pp.
  80. Tyrtania, Leonardo (1993), “Naturaleza y ecología de la mente”, en Iztapalapa. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, vol. 31, pp. 69-82.
  81. Van Dooren, Thom y Bird Rose, Deborah (2016), “Lively Ethography. Storying animist worlds”, en Environmental Humanities, vol. 8, num. 1, pp. 77-94. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3527731
  82. Van Dooren, Thomas; Kirskey, Eben y Münster, Ursula (2016), “Multispeces studies. Cultivating arts of attentiveness”, en Environmental Humanities, vol. 8, núm.1, pp. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3527695
  83. Vander Velden, Felipe y Cebolla Badie, Marilyn (2011), “A relação entre natureza e cultura em sua diversidade: percepções, classificações e práticas”, en AVA Revista de Antropología, núm. 19, pp. 15-47.
  84. Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo (2015), Metafísicas Canibais, Cosac Naify, São Paulo, Brasil, 288 pp.